MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Updated analysis of the inducible T-cell co-stimulatory receptor (ICOS) agonist, GSK3359609 (GSK609), combination with pembrolizumab (PE) in patients (pts) with anti-PD-1/L1 treatment-naïve head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

2020· article· en· W3031455888 on OpenAlexaff
Eric Angevin, Stefanie L. Groenland, Annette M. Lim, Juan Martín-Liberal, Víctor Moreno, José Trigo, Christophe Le Tourneau, Matthen Mathew, Daniel C. Cho, Aaron R. Hansen, David Vicente, Michele Maio, Antoîne Italiano, Jessica R. Bauman, Michael Chisamore, Helen Zhou, Catherine Ellis, Marc Ballas, Axel Hoos, Danny Rischin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
Canadian institutionsPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInternal medicinePembrolizumabRefractory (planetary science)PopulationGastroenterologyCancerHead and neck cancerCombination therapyOncologyImmunotherapy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

6517 Background: INDUCE-1 (NCT02723955) is a first-in-human study investigating GSK609, an IgG4 ICOS agonist non-T-cell depleting antibody, as monotherapy and combination therapy with anti-cancer agents that includes PE. A range of GSK609 dose levels (≥0.1–1 mg/kg) having biological and clinical activity were identified and evaluated in the expansion phase with GSK609 0.3 mg/kg selected as the dose for further investigation. Results from the HNSCC expansion cohorts (ECs) showed GSK609 has single agent activity in pts with relapsed/refractory disease, and early clinical activity in combination with PE in pts with anti-PD-1/L1 treatment-naïve disease (Rischin, et al. Annals of Oncol 2019;30[Supplement_5]:v454–5). Updated results from the GSK609/PE HNSCC EC are presented. Methods: Eligible pts for the HNSCC EC had anti-PD-1/L1 treatment-naïve disease, ≤5 prior lines of therapy, measurable disease, and no active autoimmune disease. Pts received GSK609 0.3 mg/kg + PE 200 mg every 3 weeks (wks) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, up to 2 years (yrs)/35 cycles. Disease assessments were performed every 9 wks through wk 54 then every 12 wks thereafter. Pts were followed for survival and subsequent anti-cancer therapy. Results: As of 11 October 2019, 34 pts were enrolled and evaluable for efficacy analyses. The median age of this population was 61.5 yrs (range: 37–77); 85% were male; 53% received ≥1 prior line of therapy in the metastatic setting. ORR was 26% (95% CI: 12.9, 44.4; n = 9 with 4 complete and 5 partial responses); disease control rate was 68% (95% CI: 49.5, 82.6; n = 23). Among pts with PD-L1 IHC status by 22C3 pharmDx assay (n = 24; 71%), the majority of pts with a response or stable disease (SD) had PD-L1 CPS status < 20 (11 of 15 pts including 1 SD pt with CPS < 1). Median PFS was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9, 6,2). Median OS was not reached at time of analysis (95% CI: 8.2, NR); 6-month OS rate was 84% (95% CI: 66, 93). Treatment-related adverse events were reported in 66% of pts; the majority of events were Grades 1 or 2 with < 10% of pts experiencing ≥ Grade 3 events. Conclusions: This updated analysis with a more mature dataset shows promising clinical activity that supports further randomized investigation of GSK609 in combination with PE with an OS endpoint in HNSCC. Clinical trial information: NCT02723955 .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersFrench-language works237,207