MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in patients with Parkinson disease psychosis

2019· article· en· W3031627665 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua xingwei yixue yu naokexue zazhi · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvanced Computing and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseRapid eye movement sleepInternal medicineREM sleep behavior disorderPolysomnographyPsychosisMedicineSleep disorderDiseaseMontreal Cognitive AssessmentGastroenterologyPsychologyPsychiatryCognitive impairmentInsomniaElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the sleep structure characteristics and risk factors in patients with Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP). Methods Fifty-one patients with Parkinson disease were enrolled.Sixteen cases met the diagnostic criteria of Parkinson disease psychosis were included in the PDP group, while the remaining 35 cases were included in the PD group as the control group.Sleep status was monitored by polysomnography.Neuropsychological assessment of patients with Parkinson disease was performed by Parkinson quality of life questionnaire, Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA )and Hoehn-Yahr state(H-Y) of Parkinson disease. Results There were statistically significant differences in age of onset in PD group and PDP group (64.11±8.87, 57.44±10.07, t=1.242), course of disease (2 (1, 4), 6 (4, 7), Z=-3.888), HY stage (2 (1.5, 2.5), 3 (2, 3), Z=-2.487)(all P<0.05). The total sleep time in the PDP group was lower than that in the PD group ((344.06±26.39)min, (361.74±17.16)min, P<0.05). Compared with the PD group, the proportion of slow wave sleep phase Ⅰ in the PDP group was bigger ((42.88±7.99)%, (37.14±5.21)%, t=-3.065), and the proportion of slow wave sleep phase II in the PDP group was smaller ((31.19±5.92)%, (37.51±5.70)%, t=3.634)(P<0.05). Single factor binary logistic regression analysis showed that the course of disease, age of onset, RBD, HY stage, PDQ-39 questionnaire score, total sleep time, slow wave sleep stage I (%) and slow wave sleep stage II (%) were the risk factors of PDP (P<0.05). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that the course of disease and RBD were independent risk factors for patients with PDP (P<0.05). Conclusion Sleep structure changes in patients with PDP, and RBD is the independent risk factor for patients with Parkinson's psychotic disorders. Key words: Parkinson disease; Parkinson disease psychosis; Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder; Polysomnography

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it