MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder in patients with Parkinson disease psychosis

2019· article· en· W3031627665 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gaiqing Yang, Zhiqiang Xu, Lixia Xu, Dongya Zhang, Xiaoyi Zhang, Jiang Jiaojiao, Lihong Feng

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua xingwei yixue yu naokexue zazhi · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAdvanced Computing and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParkinson's diseaseRapid eye movement sleepInternal medicineREM sleep behavior disorderPolysomnographyPsychosisMedicineSleep disorderDiseaseMontreal Cognitive AssessmentGastroenterologyPsychologyPsychiatryCognitive impairmentInsomniaElectroencephalography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the sleep structure characteristics and risk factors in patients with Parkinson disease psychosis (PDP). Methods Fifty-one patients with Parkinson disease were enrolled.Sixteen cases met the diagnostic criteria of Parkinson disease psychosis were included in the PDP group, while the remaining 35 cases were included in the PD group as the control group.Sleep status was monitored by polysomnography.Neuropsychological assessment of patients with Parkinson disease was performed by Parkinson quality of life questionnaire, Montreal cognitive assessment(MoCA )and Hoehn-Yahr state(H-Y) of Parkinson disease. Results There were statistically significant differences in age of onset in PD group and PDP group (64.11±8.87, 57.44±10.07, t=1.242), course of disease (2 (1, 4), 6 (4, 7), Z=-3.888), HY stage (2 (1.5, 2.5), 3 (2, 3), Z=-2.487)(all P<0.05). The total sleep time in the PDP group was lower than that in the PD group ((344.06±26.39)min, (361.74±17.16)min, P<0.05). Compared with the PD group, the proportion of slow wave sleep phase Ⅰ in the PDP group was bigger ((42.88±7.99)%, (37.14±5.21)%, t=-3.065), and the proportion of slow wave sleep phase II in the PDP group was smaller ((31.19±5.92)%, (37.51±5.70)%, t=3.634)(P<0.05). Single factor binary logistic regression analysis showed that the course of disease, age of onset, RBD, HY stage, PDQ-39 questionnaire score, total sleep time, slow wave sleep stage I (%) and slow wave sleep stage II (%) were the risk factors of PDP (P<0.05). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that the course of disease and RBD were independent risk factors for patients with PDP (P<0.05). Conclusion Sleep structure changes in patients with PDP, and RBD is the independent risk factor for patients with Parkinson's psychotic disorders. Key words: Parkinson disease; Parkinson disease psychosis; Rapid eye movement sleep behavior disorder; Polysomnography

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua xingwei yixue yu naokexue zazhiSame topicAdvanced Computing and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207