Plasma Free Choline Concentration Did Not Reflect Dietary Choline Intake in Early and Late Pregnancy: Findings from the APrON Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Choline is a critical nutrient for fetal development. Pregnancy studies showed that most women have choline intakes below the adequate intake (AI) level of 450 mg/d. Research on plasma free choline as an indicator of dietary choline intake showed conflicting results to date. We sought to compare plasma free choline concentration between women with different choline intakes and to explore the association between plasma free choline and dietary choline intake in early (EP) and late pregnancy (LP). This study included data and non-fasting plasma samples from pregnant women enrolled in the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) cohort study. EP (<20 weeks of gestation) and LP (>20 weeks of gestation) dietary choline intake was estimated using a 24-hr recall. Two categories of dietary choline intake were created: 1) low choline (LCI), i.e., choline intake in 1st quartile (Q) in EP, with these women having choline intake in 1st or 2nd Q in LP (n = 61); 2) high choline intake (HCI), i.e., choline intake in 4th Q in EP and in 3rd or 4th Q in LP (n = 46). Linear mixed-effects models were used to explore the association between plasma free choline and dietary choline intake across EP and LP, after adjustment for maternal age, ethnicity and weeks of gestation. Median (IQR) maternal age was 32 (30–35) y, and 80% were Caucasian. LCI was 101 (86–109) and 109 (93–127) mg/day in EP and LP, respectively, and HCI was 251 (223–286) and 212 (177–274) mg/day. Plasma free choline (μmol/L) did not differ between LCI and HCI at EP [LCI: 10.6 (9.03, 12.9); HCI: 11.7 (10.2, 13.8)] and LP [LCI: 11.7 (10.6, 12.7); HCI: 12.7 (10.7, 15.8)] (P > 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Per 10 mg of choline intake, plasma free choline increased by 0.34 (95%CI 0.12, 0.56) in those with LCI, and 0.18 (95%CI 0.050, 0.31) in women with HCI, across EP and LP after adjustment. In this subgroup of pregnant women, plasma free choline concentration did not reflect differences in dietary choline intake in EP or LP. This may be explained by an overall low choline intake (
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".