MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3031839624 · doi:10.1093/cdn/nzaa067_052

Plasma Free Choline Concentration Did Not Reflect Dietary Choline Intake in Early and Late Pregnancy: Findings from the APrON Study

2020· article· en· W3031839624 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Developments in Nutrition · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicFolate and B Vitamins Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCholinePregnancyMedicineInternal medicineEndocrinologyGestationQuartileBiologyConfidence interval

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Choline is a critical nutrient for fetal development. Pregnancy studies showed that most women have choline intakes below the adequate intake (AI) level of 450 mg/d. Research on plasma free choline as an indicator of dietary choline intake showed conflicting results to date. We sought to compare plasma free choline concentration between women with different choline intakes and to explore the association between plasma free choline and dietary choline intake in early (EP) and late pregnancy (LP). This study included data and non-fasting plasma samples from pregnant women enrolled in the Alberta Pregnancy Outcomes and Nutrition (APrON) cohort study. EP (<20 weeks of gestation) and LP (>20 weeks of gestation) dietary choline intake was estimated using a 24-hr recall. Two categories of dietary choline intake were created: 1) low choline (LCI), i.e., choline intake in 1st quartile (Q) in EP, with these women having choline intake in 1st or 2nd Q in LP (n = 61); 2) high choline intake (HCI), i.e., choline intake in 4th Q in EP and in 3rd or 4th Q in LP (n = 46). Linear mixed-effects models were used to explore the association between plasma free choline and dietary choline intake across EP and LP, after adjustment for maternal age, ethnicity and weeks of gestation. Median (IQR) maternal age was 32 (30–35) y, and 80% were Caucasian. LCI was 101 (86–109) and 109 (93–127) mg/day in EP and LP, respectively, and HCI was 251 (223–286) and 212 (177–274) mg/day. Plasma free choline (μmol/L) did not differ between LCI and HCI at EP [LCI: 10.6 (9.03, 12.9); HCI: 11.7 (10.2, 13.8)] and LP [LCI: 11.7 (10.6, 12.7); HCI: 12.7 (10.7, 15.8)] (P > 0.05, Wilcoxon rank-sum test). Per 10 mg of choline intake, plasma free choline increased by 0.34 (95%CI 0.12, 0.56) in those with LCI, and 0.18 (95%CI 0.050, 0.31) in women with HCI, across EP and LP after adjustment. In this subgroup of pregnant women, plasma free choline concentration did not reflect differences in dietary choline intake in EP or LP. This may be explained by an overall low choline intake (<AI) which would promote rapid tissue uptake of choline. The identification of a sensitive and dynamic biomarker for choline status is required. UBC Four Year Doctoral Fellowship, Canada Research Chair Program, CIHR NTE Grant FRN 160,942, Alberta Innovates for the APrON cohort.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.074
Threshold uncertainty score0.600

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it