MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Study on the correlation between cerebral hemodynamics and cognitive function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

2018· article· en· W3031941277 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Asthma · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technologies in Various Fields
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCOPDTranscranial DopplerInternal medicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentHemodynamicsPulmonary diseaseMiddle cerebral arteryCardiologyCorrelationCognitive impairmentDiseaseIschemia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To evaluate the characteristics of cerebral hemodynamics and its correlation with cognitive function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods Two hundred outpatients with COPD and 200 sex-and age-matched outpatients over the same period were used as a control group.Monteal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were used to evaluate the cognitive function.The mean flow velocity (Vm), pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI) and breath holding index (BHI) of bilateral middle cerebral artery (MCA) were examined by means of transcranial Doppler ultrasound in all subjects. Results The score of COPD group significantly was lower than that in control group [(22.95±3.71) scores vs (26.12±0.90) scores], the frequency of MoCA≤25 group was 21.5% in COPD group, significantly higher than that in control group (9.0%). Compared with control group, Vm [(53.31±0.96) cm/s vs (46.80±0.83) cm/s], BHI(1.21±0.72 vs 0.72±0.12) significantly decreased, and PI (0.83±0.04 vs 1.14±0.59), RI(0.52±0.04 vs 0.66±0.41) significantly increased in MoCA≤25 COPD group.Compared with MoCA>25 COPD group, BHI (0.98±0.91 vs 0.72±0.12) of MoCA≤25 COPD group significantly decreased, and PI (1.10±0.41 vs 1.14±0.59), RI (0.55±0.79 vs 0.66±0.41) significantly increased. Conclusions Cognitive function and cerebral hemodynamics in patients with COPD are impaired.PI has a positive correlation with the likelihood of cognitive impairment, howere, BHI has the opposite relationship. Key words: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; Hemodynamics; Cognition impariment; Transcranial Doppler

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.130
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it