MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032042582 · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.1133

1139 Sleep Disturbances In Chronic Stroke Patients: Emotional And Cognitive Impact

2020· article· en· W3032042582 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stefanie Howell, Sarah Robinson, Grace S. Griesbach

Bibliographic record

VenueSLEEP · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolysomnographySleep onsetREM sleep behavior disorderPsychologyArousalMedicineEffects of sleep deprivation on cognitive performanceInternal medicineApneaAudiologyCognitionInsomniaPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction The objective was to investigate the impact of sleep-wake disturbances (SWD) on cognition and quality of life in the post-acute phase of stroke. Methods Adult stroke (n=92) patients were assessed for SWD via overnight polysomnography. The mean age was 52 ± 1 years and mean latency from injury was 117 ± 10 days. Sleep measures included total sleep time (TST), sleep and REM latency, percent time in sleep stages, apnea/hypopnea index (AHI), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and arousal index. The primary cognitive/outcome measures were: Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), California Verbal Learning Test (CVLT-II), Neuro-QoL and Mayo Portland Adaptability Inventory (MPAI). Results Women had lower AHI (F(1,88)=9.360, p<.01), fewer arousals (F(1,90)=4.53, p<.05), and spent significantly more time in SWS (F(1,90)=11.525, p<.001) than men; however, SWS was reduced in both sexes. SWS made up < 3% of TST in 60% of patients and was not correlated with higher AHI. SWDs negatively impacted subjective quality of life (NeuroQOL). Longer latencies to sleep were associated with increased depression (p<.05) and decreased positive affect (p<.01). Increased sleep efficiency led to improved positive affect (p<.05) and decreases in emotional/behavioral dyscontrol (p<.05). Increased time in REM sleep decreased emotional/behavioral dyscontrol (p<.05), while increasing satisfaction with social roles and activities(p<.01). SWDs also negatively impacted cognitive/outcome scores. Increased TST and sleep efficiency led to higher scores on CVLT-II list B and long delay free recall (p<.05), while higher AHI led to poorer performance on long delay and forced choice recognition trials (p<.01). Additionally, non-REM AHI negatively impacted MPAI adjustment scores (F(1,69)=4.036, p<.05). Conclusion Male stroke patients displayed significantly more arousals and spent less time in SWS than females. For both sexes, better sleep indicated improved quality of life. Sleep measures were correlated with cognitive/outcome measures. Non-REM AHI significantly predicted outcome at discharge from rehabilitation facility. Support

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.387

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSLEEPSame topicStroke Rehabilitation and RecoveryFrench-language works237,207