Effect of TOMATIS auditory training on cognition and post-traumatic stress disorder in breast cancer chemotherapy patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the effect of TOMATIS auditory training on improving cognitive and post-traumatic stress disorder in patients after breast cancer chemotherapy. Methods Eighty invasive ductal carcinoma of breast cancer patients with cognition and psychological disorders were selected in the breast department of Tangshan People's Hospital from October 2016 to September 2017.All patients were randomly divided into control group (n=40) and experimental group (n=40). The experimental group was given the TOMATIS high and low audio frequency auditory training, and the control group was given ordinary music training.Before and after the intervention, the Chinese version of the Montreal cognitive assessment scale (MoCA) and the post-traumatic stress disorder scale (PTSD-SS) were evaluated for both groups of patients. Results After the intervention, the experimental group had significantly higher scores in visual structure skills((3.83±0.71)vs(2.68±0.57)), executive function ((2.23±0.53)vs(1.55±0.50)), attention and concentration((1.55±0.78)vs(1.23±0.53)), language((1.50±0.75)vs(1.08±0.47)), calculation((2.00±0.60)vs(1.45±0.75)), abstract thinking((1.63±0.54)vs(1.00±0.51)), memory((4.68±0.47)vs(2.70±0.72)), directive force((5.25±0.54)vs(3.90±0.81)) and total score((22.65±2.89)vs(15.58±2.10))than the control group(all P<0.05). After intervention, the scores of subjective assessment of traumatic events((2.60±0.63)vs(3.98±0.62)), repeated recurring experiences((24.05±2.72)vs(26.70±2.28)), avoidance symptoms((24.35±1.64)vs(26.40±1.19)), increased alertness((24.23±1.80)vs(25.45±1.20)), impaired social function((7.28±1.01)vs(8.68±0.66)), and total scores((85.85±5.13)vs(94.63±2.92)) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (all P<0.01). Conclusion TOMATIS auditory training can effectively improve the cognitive function and psychological state in breast cancer chemotherapy patients, which is worthy of popularization and application. Key words: TOMATIS auditory training; Breast cancer; Chemotherapy; Cognitive dysfunction; Post-traumatic stress disorder
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".