Development of successful ageing multidimensional assessment scale and its reliability and validity
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective According to the theoretic framework of successful ageing,this study developed a multidimensional Successful Ageing Assessment Scale and tested its reliability and validity.Methods Through literature review,the study determined evaluative dimension,structure and scoring method.Then,the Successful Ageing Multidimensional Assessment Scale(SAMAS) was developed and was optimized by the expert consultation,semi-structured interview and twice tests.The predicted sample was conducted with item analysis,and testing of reliability and validity; the formal tested sample was conducted with item analysis,conformance testing and testing of reliability and validity.Then the formal tested sample was tested and retested two weeks later.The intestine emendatory Activities of Daily Living Scale (ADL),Mini Mental State Examination Scale (MMSE),Social Disability Screening Schedule (SDSS) and Memorial University of Newfoundland Scale of Happiness(MUNSH) were used to test its criteri-on validity.Results SAMAS consisted of 5 dimensions,including chronic disease state,physical perfor-mance,cognitive function,social function,subjective well-being.Item analysis showed the dimensions of scale and total scale scores had positive correlation.In conformance testing,the Kappa value was 0.65～0.86,test-retest reliability was 0.66～0.85 and the internal consistency reliability was 0.88.The correl-ative coefficient of the physical performance and social function scores were negatively correlated with ADL scores and SSDS scores,the correlative coefficient of the cognitive function and subjective well-being scores were positively correlated with MMSE scores and MUNSH scores.Conclusions SAMAS suggested good reliability,validity and could well evaluate comprehensive health for the elderly,at the same time could distinguish between SA and non SA group. Key words: Successful ageing; Multidimensional health measurement; Scale development
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it