Rehabilitation of "Six Healing Sounds" on MCI of the old-aged persons
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To observe the rehabilitation of Six Healing Sounds on MCI of the oldaged persons.Methods All patients were randomly divided into Six Healing Sounds exercise group and control group using random number table.MOCA,and MMSE were adopted for evaluating the efficacy of the subjects before and six months after the practice.Nerve-physiology information workstation was setup to record the changes of cerebral electric powder of both groups before and 6 months after the treatment.The data was further analyzed by intelligent cerebral powder analyzing system.Results ①After six months practice,total score of MOCA (25.18 ± 5.07) and MMSE (26.03 ± 2.63) increased significantly after the treatment in the exercise group,which showed significant difference than the control group [MOCA (22.83 ± 4.95) and MMSE (24.86± 2.98)].MOCA increased significantly in attention (5.04 ± 0.90),delay memory (3.02 ± 0.89),verbal(2.30±0.57) sub-item scores after the treatment in the exercise group,showed significant differences than the control group [attention (4.28 ± 1.08),delay memory (2.33 ± 0.95),verbal (2.13 ± 0.51)] ; MMSE also demonstrated a significant increase a in split-second memory(2.35 ±0.43),delay memory(2.42±0.48),verbal (8.49± 0.54) sub-item scores after the treatment in the exercise group,showed significant differences than the control group [split-second memory (2.15 ± 0.34),delay memory (2.14± 0.83),verba (8.13 ± 0.70)].②Frequency changes:the change of δ (0.0848± 0.0373) μ v 2 was decreased than before in the exercise group after 6 months; the change of α1 (0.3753± 0.1470) μ v2was increased than before in the exercise group after 6 months; the change ofδ and θ (0.2266±0.0953)μ v2 had significant difference after the treatment between the two group [control group:δ (0.1095 ± 0.0520) μ v2 θ (0.2589 ± 0.0862) μ v 2and α1 (0.3160 ±0.1540)μ v 2].③Space changes:in the ratio of (δ + θ) / (α1+α2+β1+β2):F4(0.5115±0.4262)、O 1 (0.3365 ± 0.2436)、O2 (0.3536± 0.2671)、T4 (0.4581 ± 0.3798)、T5 (0.3198± 0.3608)、Fp (10.8233 ±0.6857) 、Fp2 (0.7710± 0.6352)、C3 (0.3702 ± 0.3910)、C4 (0.3896 ± 0.3523)、P4 (0.3523 ± 0.2333)、T6 (0.2972± 0.4276)were decreased than before in the exercise group after 6 months; C3、C4、P4、T4、T5 、T6、Fpl had significant difference after the treatment between the two group[control group:C3 (0.5706±0.4944)、C4 (0.5780 ± 0.4996)、P4 (0.4835 ± 0.3641)、T4 (0.6294 ± 0.4186)、T5 (0.4882 ± 0.4000)、T6 (0.4879±0.4131)、Fp1 (1.0125±0.7476)].Conclusion Six Healing Sounds had rehabilitation effects on MCI of the old-aged persons. Key words: Six Healing Sounds; MCI
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".