Effects of hypertriglyceridemic-waist phenotype on cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effect of hypertriglyceridemic-waist(HTWC)phenotype on cognitive function in patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods According to the standard of plasma triglycerides concentration≥1.7 mmoL/L, waist circumference(WC)≥90 cm in men or ≥80 cm in women, 304 patients with type 2 diabetes were divided into four groups: normal triglycerides and waist circumference group(group A, n=65), normal waist circumference and hypertriglyceridemia group(group B, n=53), abdominal obesity and normal triglycerides group(group C, n=114), and HTWC group(group D, n=72)for prospective studies.Patients in four groups were surveyed with Mini-mental state examination(MMSE)and Montreal cognitive assessment(MOCA). And changes of cognitive function among the four groups were compared. Results Total score for the MMSE was significantly lower in group D than in group A(27.1±1.9 vs.29.0±1.3, F=2.869, P=0.019). The subscales of attention and calculation(4.0±1.4 vs.4.6±0.9, F=1.605, P=0.047)and recall(2.2±0.9 vs.2.6±0.6, F=1.959, P=0.043)were significantly lower in group D than in group A. Total score for the MOCA was significantly lower in group D than in group A(23.4±3.9 vs.25.9±3.6, F=1.975, P=0.031). The subscales of visuospatial and executive(3.5±1.4 vs.4.1±0.9, F=1.537, P=0.048), attention(5.1±1.4 vs.5.7±0.9, F=1.660, P=0.048)and orientation(5.6±1.0 vs.6.0±0.0, F=2.362, P=0.030)were significantly lower in group D than in group A. Conclusions There is a statistically more significant decline in cognitive function in patients with HTWC phenotype and the effective intervention and treatment are needed. Key words: Diabetes mellitus, type 2; Triglycerides; Cognition disorders
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".