Clinical study on influenza viruses infection detected by gold immunchromatographic assay in hospitalized patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To study the common influenza viruses infection of hospitalized patients admitted for acute respiratory tract infections, using gold immunchromatographic assay ( GICA ) to detect influenza viruses. Methods The result of FluA/B antigen detection in 1145 patients with various types of respiratory diseases from two class-A hospitals were analyzed. Influenza virus detection rates of patients in different seasons,with different gender,age,types of respiratory diseases and whether with foundation diseases were analyzed to identify the common rules and characteristics. Results There were significant differences for Flu A/b detection rate between first quarter and the second or third quarter,P <0.05 by x2 test( FluA x2 = 17. 735, P = 0.000;X2 = 14.855,P = 0. 000;FluB x2 =5. 326,P = 0. 021;x2 = 4.349, P = 0.037 ) . The result was repeated in the comparison between Flu A/B detection rate in the fourth quarter and the second or third quarter,P <0. 05 by x2 test (FluA x2 =19. 480,P= 0.000;x2 =16.771,,P=0. 000;FluB X2 = 6. 885.P = 0. 009;x2 =5. 959,P =0.015). These results indicated the detection rates of the first and fourth quarter were higher than the second and third quarter. Elderly patients (≥65 years old) had higher Flu A/ B detection rate compared with patients below 65 years ( FluA x2 =55. 362,P = 0.000;FluB x2 = 8.984,P = 0.003). The detection rate of Flu A/B in patients without foundation diseases or with one,two or three kinds of foundation diseases had significant differences, which showed with an increase in the number of types of the foundation diseases, FluA/B-positive detection rate increased. In patients with various foundation diseases, the FluA antigen detection rate in group of AECOPD patients was 18.2% and 17.1% in pneumonia group, which were higher than in all other diseases. Conclusions Sporadic cases of influenza were found in general wards, incidence rate was higher in the first and the fourth quarter. There is a higher risk of influenza virus infection for elder patients and patients with foundation diseases. Key words: Gold immunochromatographic assay; Hospitalized patients; Influenza viruses; Infection
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".