A phase Ib/II study of eribulin with cyclophosphamide (EC) in patients (pts) with advanced breast cancer (ABC).
Bibliographic record
Abstract
e13079 Background: Eribulin is an effective microtubule inhibitor for the treatment of ABC. Based on encouraging efficacy with docetaxel/cyclophosphamide, we hypothesized that eribulin combined with cyclophosphamide (EC) would be effective with tolerable toxicity. The aim of the study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of EC, followed by a dose expansion study to estimate the clinical benefit rate (CBR) of EC in pts with ABC. Methods: Study eligibility included pts with histologically confirmed ABC with any number of prior lines of therapy. Pts were treated using a dose escalation strategy with cohort expansion once MTD was determined. Dose level 0 (DL0): E 1.1 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, C 600 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. DL1: E 1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, C 600 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Phase II expanded enrollment at DL1. The primary objective of the phase II study was CBR [(complete response (CR), partial response (PR), and stable disease (SD)]. Secondary objectives were response rate (RR), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), and safety. Using a 2-stage design, responses in 3 of the first 22 pts allowed continued enrollment to a planned 40. Results: No dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were identified in phase Ib (n = 6). 3 pts were treated at DL0 and 3 at DL1, the MTD. 44 pts with ABC were enrolled at the MTD and are included in the analysis. 31 pts had HR+/HER2- disease, 12 pts had triple negative disease (TNBC), 1 pt had HR+/HER2+ disease. Median age was 56 yrs, prior treatment (rx) for ABC included a median of 1 line of hormone rx (range 0-6) and 2 lines of prior chemorx (range 0-7). CBR was 79.5% (35/44; 7 PR, 28 SD) and median PFS 16.4 wks (95%CI:13.8-21.1 wks). Longer PFS was observed in those with HR+ disease vs TNBC (18.1 vs 10.8 wks; P = 0.067). Adverse events (AE) of any grade included fatigue (68.2%, n = 30), neutropenia (ntp) (59.1%, n = 26), nausea (56.8%, n = 25), constipation (50%, n = 22), peripheral neuropathy (47.7%, n = 21), dyspnea (40.9%, n = 18), headache (36.4%, n = 16), and anorexia (36.4%, n = 16). The most common grade 3/4 AE ntp (47.7%, n = 21); 3 pts had febrile ntp. Dose reductions due to ntp were required to 500 mg/m2 C (n = 17) and to 1.1 mg/m2 in eribulin (n = 12). Conclusions: EC in heavily pretreated ABC resulted in an encouraging CBR of 79.5% and PFS of 16.4 wks, comparing favorably to single agent E (PFS 14.8 wks). Dose reduction and delays were due primarily to ntp. EC is an effective combination therapy with manageable toxicity in ABC. Clinical trial information: NCT01554371 .
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".