MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A clinical trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of oxiracetam in the treatment of patient with post-stroke cognitive impairment

2013· article· en· W3032297401 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Weiwei Zhang, Xiaogang Li, Moli Wang, Dan-to Peng, Li Guo, Xiaojie Cai, Fei Chen, Ying Li

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Neurol · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicOxidative Organic Chemistry Reactions
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPiracetamMontreal Cognitive AssessmentMedicineRandomized controlled trialActivities of daily livingCognitive impairmentStroke (engine)Clinical trialPhysical therapyCognitionAnesthesiaInternal medicinePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of oxiracetam in the treatment of patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment. Methods In this randomized,double-blind trial,200 patients with post-stroke cognitive impairment were randomized 1∶1 to receive: oxiracetam 800 mg and 4 piracetam simulation tablets three times daily for 6 months,or piracetam 1600 mg and 2 oxiracetam simulation capsules,three times daily for 6 months.These clinical parameters were tested by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA),Mini-mental State Examination (MMSE) and Activity of Daily Living Scale (ADL) during a 6-month follow-up period. Results After 6 months of treatment,the MMSE score showed that the oxiracetam-intervention group’s score improved by a mean of 3.24 points,with a total effective rate of 91.6%,which was higher than that of the control group (2.30 points),and the difference in point change between the 2 groups was statistically significant (t=2.079,P=0.039),MoCA score showed that the oxiracetam-intervention group’s score improved by a mean of 5.82 points,which was higher than that of the control group (4.76 points).The ADL efficacy analysis showed that the oxiracetam-intervention group’s score decreased by a mean of 6.44 points,which was higher than that of the control group (4.39 points),and the score ratio change differences between the 2 groups was not statistically significant (t=1.798,P=0.074;t=-1.914,P=0.057).The situation of patients’cognitive impairment got better along with the oxiracetam treatment for 1,2,4,6 months,so was the total effective rate (P<0.01). Conclusions This research proves that oxiracetam has definitely therapeutic effect on patient with post-stroke cognitive impairment.With the extension of treatment time,the situation of patients gets even better.MMSE score shows that oxiracetam has better effect on improving post-stroke cognitive impairment than piracetam,and oxiracetam does not show any serious adverse reactions.Oxiracetam has little adverse reactions and it shows impressive safety. Key words: Stroke; Pyrrolidines; Cognition disorders; Reproducibility of results

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.210
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J NeurolSame topicOxidative Organic Chemistry ReactionsFrench-language works237,207