MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Influences of epidural labor analgesia on maternal postpartum cognitive function after vaginal delivery: a prospective cohort study

2019· article· en· W3032309573 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jianwei Wang, Rui Ma, Feng Zhou, Xiaoyu Zhang, Zifeng Xu, Weiwei Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua weichan yixue zazhi · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAnesthesia and Pain Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineMontreal Cognitive AssessmentProspective cohort studyVaginal deliveryAnesthesiaIncidence (geometry)CohortPostoperative cognitive dysfunctionLogistic regressionObstetricsPregnancyCognitionSurgeryInternal medicineCognitive impairment

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the incidence of cognitive dysfunction in postpartum women who underwent epidural or non-drug labor analgesia and the influence factors. Methods A prospective cohort study was performed in 1 618 uneventful singleton pregnancies in International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital from January 2017 to January 2018. Women who received epidural labor analgesia were assigned to the epidural group (n=803), and those who received Doula technique non-drug labor analgesia rather than labor analgesia to the control group (n=815). Cognitive function was assessed using symbol digit modalities test (SDMT90) and Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) 1 d and 42 d after delivery. Incidence of maternal cognitive dysfunction, SDMT90 scores and pain intensity measured by visual analogue score (VAS) at the cervical dilatation of 3, 6 and 10 cm between the two groups were compared using independent sample t-test, Chi-square test or logistic regression analysis. Results MoCA and SDMT90 scores of the epidural group were significantly higher than those of the control group 1 d after delivery (27.1±1.5 vs 26.2±1.8, 49.1±2.4 vs 42.5±3.6; t=3.775 and 16.956, both P<0.05), but the incidence of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD) in the epidural group was remarkably lower comparing to the control group [13.9% (112/803) vs 21.2% (173/815), χ2=14.769, P=0.002]. The VAS scores of the epidural group at the cervical dilatation of 3, 6 and 10 cm were all lower than those of the control group (2.3±0.6 vs 6.9±1.3, 3.3±0.9 vs 8.7±0.9, 5.7±0.9 vs 9.7±0.4; t=0.013, 0.011 and 0.015; all P<0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicated that VAS scores ≤ 3 at the cervical dilatation of 3, 6 and 10 cm were protective factors against the incidence of POCD 1 d after delivery [OR(95%CI): 0.238 (0.198-0.287), 0.180 (0.145-0.222) and 0.112 (0.088-0.142), all P<0.001], while the absence of epidural labor analgesia was a risk factor (OR=4.698, 95%CI:1.812-11.321, P<0.001). Conclusions Epidural labor analgesia can reduce the incidence of postpartum cognitive dysfunction in women 1 d after delivery. The incidence of POCD has close relationship with the VAS scores at the cervical dilatation of 3, 6 and 10 cm and epidural labor analgesia. Key words: Labor, obstetric; Analgesia, epidural; Cognitive Dysfunction; Neuropsychological tests; Prospective studies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua weichan yixue zazhiSame topicAnesthesia and Pain ManagementFrench-language works237,207