An Applied Method for Clustering Extended Targets With UHF Radar
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, the application of coherent ultra-high frequency (UHF) Doppler radar for ship target detection over river is investigated. Due to the wide beam and high resolution of UHF radar, ship target echoes are usually significantly extended in both the range and Doppler dimensions of the radar Range-Doppler (R-D) spectrum. The range and radial velocity of the extended target are difficult to be determined using a constant false alarm rate (CFAR) detector, especially for the low-radial-velocity case in which the detection performance of CFAR detector is deteriorated due to strong river clutter. To solve this problem, an applied clustering method is proposed to detect and classify multiple targets and obtain corresponding target centers from the CFAR outputs. The target extension characteristics, which are used for clustering, are modeled and employed in segments for different range. The effectiveness of the proposed method is validated using both simulated and field data and the clustering method can classify extended targets without the need of knowing the number of targets beforehand.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it