Adaptation d’un protocole de collaboration basé sur les niveaux d’interdépendance et les besoins des intervenants au sein d’une école primaire soutenant la scolarisation d’élèves ayant un TSA en classe ordinaire
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Adaptation d'un protocole de collaboration bas sur les niveaux d'interdpendance et les besoins des intervenants au sein d'une cole primaire soutenant la scolarisation d'lves ayant un TSA en classe ordinaire Formation et profession 28(1), 2020 sum Cet article prsente une recherche-dveloppement proposant l'adaptation d'un protocole visant soutenir la collaboration entre les intervenants scolaires impliqus lors de l'intgration d' lves ayant un trouble du spectre de l'autisme (TSA). Les objectifs de cette recherche taient : 1) d' tudier les pratiques collaboratives selon le modle thorique du continuum d'interdpendance de Beaumont, Lavoie et Couture (2010) et 2) d'adapter un protocole dj existant pour soutenir la collaboration et mieux rpondre aux besoins du milieu. Les pratiques collaboratives tudies atteignaient des niveaux intermdiaires d'interdpendance. Des adaptations ont t proposes en vue d'amliorer le protocole dj en place : la centralisation des informations partage et la planification de rencontres en cours d'anne scolaire ont t ajoutes au protocole.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".