MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The cognitive function of patients with early Parkinson's disease: a five-year follow-up

2017· article· en· W3032656327 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Yanping Wang, Xiaoling Zhang, Liping Zhai, Xiaoqiang Wu, Xudong Lü, Yifeng Bu, Ziyun Liu, Jia Liu

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua laonian yixue zazhi · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGinkgo biloba and Cashew Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCognitionMontreal Cognitive AssessmentHamdRecallMedicineCognitive impairmentDiseaseParkinson's diseaseAnxietyAudiologyClinical psychologyPsychologyPediatricsPsychiatryInternal medicineCognitive psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the changes in cognitive function in patients with early Parkinson's disease (PD) in a 5-year follow-up. Methods A total of 181 PD and 173 normal participants were recruited between January 2009 and January 2012 at the Department of Neurology, the Second Hospital of Jiaxing City.Regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors of cognitive impairment, and changes in subdomains of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) were compared annually with baseline data. Results Baseline clinical data were similar between the two groups.The level of cognitive impairment was positively correlated to the age of onset and the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMD) (t=3.326, P 0.05). Seven subdomains of MoCA were attenuated, and four of them were significant different between the groups, including delayed recall, attention, abstraction task and orientation after the forth year of follow-up (all P 0.05). Conclusions Cognitive function of PD patients decreases significantly in some domains, such as delayed recall, attention, abstraction task and orientation after a five-year follow-up. Key words: Parkinson disease; Cognition disorders; Follow-up studies

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.587

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua laonian yixue zazhiSame topicGinkgo biloba and Cashew ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207