Effects of solution-focused brief therapy on self-perceived burden and quality of life in patients with stroke
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To investigate the effects of solution-focused brief therapy on self-perceived burden and quality of life in patients with stroke. Methods 60 patients with stroke recruited at the department of rehabilitation of a hospital in Chengde city from January to June 2016 were divided into control group (n=30) and experimental group (n=30). Both groups received conventional nursing care and rehabilitation treatment. In addition, the experimental group received psychological intervention of solution-focused brief therapy, 2-3 times a week, 30-45 minutes for each time.The self-perceived burden scale(SPBS), memorial university of Newfoundland scale of happiness(MUNSH) and short from 36 health survey questionaire(SF-36) were used to assess the patients before and after intervention. Results (1)The differences of the scores of SPBS ((39.27±5.83) vs (22.40±4.03), t=16.248, P<0.01) and MUNSH ((4.20±4.50) vs (31.10±3.66), t=-24.136, P<0.01) for the experimental group before and after the intervention were statistically significant. There were statistically significant differences in scores of SPBS ((22.40±4.03) vs (35.30±2.63), t=-14.683, P<0.01) and MUNSH ((31.10±3.66) vs (19.67±3.64), t=12.127, P<0.01) between the experimental group and control group after the intervention.(2)The scores of physiologic functioning, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health for the experiment group were higher than before(t=-23.427--6.624, all P<0.01). After the intervention, the scores of physiologic functioning, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional and mental health in the experiment group were higher than those in control group(t=5.705-12.806, all P<0.01). Conclusion Solution-focused brief therapy can effectively reduce the self-perceived burden of stroke patients and improve their quality of life. Key words: Solution-focused brief therapy; Stroke; Self-perceived burden; Subjective well-being; Quality of life
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".