Where are G-quadruplexes located in the human transcriptome?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It has been demonstrated that RNA G-quadruplexes (G4) are structural motifs present in transcriptomes and play important regulatory roles in several post-transcriptional mechanisms. However, the full picture of RNA G4 locations and the extent of their implication remain elusive. Solely computational prediction analysis of the whole transcriptome may reveal all potential G4, since experimental identifications are always limited to specific conditions or specific cell lines. The present study reports the first in-depth computational prediction of potential G4 region across the complete human transcriptome. Although using a relatively stringent approach based on three prediction scores that accounts for the composition of G4 sequences, the composition of their neighboring sequences, and the various forms of G4, over 1.1 million of potential G4 (pG4) were predicted. The abundance of G4 was computationally confirmed in both 5' and 3'UTR as well as splicing junction of mRNA, appreciate for the first time in the long ncRNA, while almost absent of most of the small ncRNA families. The present results constitute an important step toward a full understanding of the roles of G4 in post-transcriptional mechanisms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".