Comparative study of treatment of knee osteoarthritis with celecoxib and Yuanhu Zhitong capsule
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the clinical efficiency of Yuanhu Zhitong capsule in patients with osteoarthritis. Methods Sixty patients with osteoarthritis in Department of Orthopedics of our hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were randomly divided into experimental group and control group. The experimental group was treated with Yuanhu Zhitong capsule and sodium hyaluronate, while the control group was treated with celecoxib and sodium hyaluronate. And the function of knee joint was assessed with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index (WOMAC) and index severity of osteoarthritis (ISOA), the adverse reactions were recorded. Results The VAS score in the experimental group after treatment was (3.21±1.06), the WOMAC osteoarthritis index was (80.67±29.85), and index severity of osteoarthritis (ISOA) was (4.69±0.83), which were significantly lower than those in the control group [(5.39±2.03), (92.56±31.39), (5.22±0.57)] (P 0.05). Conclusion Yuanhu Zhitong capsule combined with sodium hyaluronate has obvious effect in patients with osteoarthritis, which can improve the score of joint function, relieve the pain of the patients, is another choice to treat the osteoarthritis patients with Chinese medicine. Key words: Yuanhu Zhitong capsule; Celecoxib; Osteoarthritis; Effect
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".