MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Clinical prognoses of acute vertebral basilar artery occlusion by endovascular treatment

2019· article· en· W3032816905 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Jinchao Liu, Hongwei Li, Fuwen Chen, Hongsheng Shi, Zhan Wang, Jianjun Gu, Ziliang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Journal of Neuromedicine · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMedical Imaging and Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThrombolysisRadiologyOcclusionRevascularizationAngiographyVertebral arteryBasilar arteryReceiver operating characteristicComputed tomography angiographyLogistic regressionSurgeryInternal medicineMyocardial infarction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To investigate the clinical prognoses of acute vertebral basilar artery occlusion by endovascular treatment and the risk factors for poor prognosis. Methods Clinical data of 43 patients with acute vertebral basilar artery occlusion who underwent endovascular treatment in our hospital from August 2016 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. The immediate revascularization rate and clinical outcomes three months after surgery were analyzed; and according to the clinical prognoses, these patients were divided into a good prognosis group and a poor prognosis group. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the NIHSS scores, times from onset to vessel recanalization, improved post-circulation CT scale of Alberta stroke project based on diffusion weighted imaging (DWI-PC-ASPECTS) scores, and MR angiography-basilar artery on computed tomography angiography prognostic scalere for basilar artery occlusion (MRA-BATMAN) scores to predict the prognoses. Univariate Logistic regression analysis and multivariate Logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate the relations of times from onset to vessel recanalization, NIHSS scores, DWI-PC-ASPECTS scores, and MRA-BATMAN scores with poor prognosis. Results Forty-three patients (100%) achieved thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (TICI) grading 3/2b immediately after surgery. The mRS scores were 0-2 in 26 patients (60.5%, good prognosis group), and those were 3-6 in 17 patients (39.5%, poor prognosis group) three months after surgery. When the NIHSS scores was 21, times from onset to vessel recanalization was 600 min, DWI-PC-ASPECTS predictive threshold was 8.5 and MRA-BATMAN predictive threshold was 6.5, the diagnostic accuracy of predicting poor prognosis was the highest (sensitivity=0.941, 0.706, 0.808, and 0.577, and specificity=0.846, 0.423, 0.647, and 0.824). Univariate Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative NIHSS scores≥21, improved DWI-PC-ASPECTS scores≤8.5, and MRA-BATMAN scores≤6.5 were risk factors for poor prognosis (P<0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that preoperative NIHSS scores≥21 was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis (OR=15.679, 95%CI: 1.608-152.879, P=0.000). Conclusion Intravascular treatment of acute vertebral basilar artery occlusion is safe and effective, and the patients with preoperative NIHSS scores≥21 are highly likely to have poor prognosis. Key words: Vertebral basilar artery; Large vessel occlusion; Endovascular treatment; Risk factor

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.254
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Journal of NeuromedicineSame topicMedical Imaging and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207