Relationships between anhedonia, alexithymia and self-efficacy in college students
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objective To explore the relationship between anhedonia, alexithymia and self-efficacy in college students. Methods 260 college students were tested with Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale(SHAPS), Temporal Experience of Pleasure Scale(TEPS), 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale(TAS-20) and General Self-Efficacy Scale(GSES). Results (1) Males showed obviously higher level of SHAPS scores (24.91±5.14) and lower level of anticipatory pleasure of TEPS (TEPS-ANT) scores(31.81±5.79) than females(22.97±5.34 and 33.36±5.71, respectively). (2)Significant difference existed between the high-scoring, the middle-scoring and the low-scoring anhedonia group in TAS factor 1(difficulty in identifying feelings) and GSES (F=3.11, 5.30, P<0.05 or 0.01), the scores of TAS factor 1(difficulty in identifying feelings) in high-scoring anhedonia group were higher than that in low-scoring anhedonia group (20.24±4.94 vs 18.10±5.07, P<0.01), and the scores of GSES in high-scoring anhedonia group were lower than that in low-scoring anhedonia group (24.97±6.72 vs 27.90±4.37, P<0.01 ). (3)The SHAPS scores were positively related to TAS factor 2(difficulty in describing feelings) and factor 3(externally oriented thinking)(r=0.18, 0.27, both P<0.01), negatively related to GSES scores(r=-0.33, P<0.01). Both TEPS-ANT and consummatory pleasure of TEPS (TEPS-CON) were negatively related to TAS factor1(difficulty in identifying feelings) scores(r=-0.22, P<0.01; r=-0.15, P<0.05), positively related to GSES scores(r=0.28, 0.26, both P<0.01). (4)Layer multivariate linear regression analysis showed that the SHAPS scores were significant predictors of the general self-efficacy(β=-0.33, P<0.01). Conclusions The anhedonia in college students has a closely relationship with alexithymia and self-efficacy, college students with high anhedonia have high level of alexithymia and low level of self-efficacy. Key words: Anhedonia; Alexithymia; Self-efficacy; College students
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".