MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A comparative study of combining intra-articular injection of platelet-rich plasma or sodium hyaluronate with isotonic muscle strength training in treating knee osteoarthritis

2019· article· en· W3032837547 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhenglu Yin, Zhaoxiang Meng, Jibing Wang, Jijun Huang, Bo Chen, Chi Xu, Shunyan Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueZhonghua wuli yixue zazhi · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPeriodontal Regeneration and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWOMACSodium hyaluronatePlatelet-rich plasmaOsteoarthritisMedicineIsometric exerciseUrologyAnesthesiaPhysical therapySurgeryInternal medicinePlateletPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To compare the efficacy of intra-articular injection of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) with that of sodium hyaluronate for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods Fifty KOA patients were randomly divided into a PRP group (n=25) and a sodium hyaluronate group (n=25). Those in the PRP group were injected intra-articularly with 5 ml of autologous PRP every 2 weeks for 6 consecutive weeks, while the sodium hyaluronate group was given intra-articular injections of 2 ml of sodium hyaluronate once a week for 6 weeks. Both groups performed isokinetic strength training three times a week for 6 weeks. Before as well as 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months after the treatment, both groups were followed and evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster University osteoarthritis index (WOMAC). A Biodex System 4 isometric muscle strength testing system was used to evaluate the knees′ peak torque (PT) in flexion and extension, total power (TW), and average power (AP). Results Before the treatment there were no significant differences in pain, stiffness or average WOMAC score between the two groups. Afterward significant improvement was observed in the pain, stiffness and WOMAC scores of both groups. Compared with the sodium hyaluronate group, significantly greater decreases in the average WOMAC pain score were observed in the PRP group after the different intervals. That was also true of the average stiffness scores and the overall average WOMAC scores after 6 and 12 months. The flexor and extensor PT, TW and AP at the angular velocities of 60°/s and 90°/s also improved significantly in both groups after 6 weeks and 12 months, with the improvement of the PRP group significantly greater than that in the control group at the same time points. Conclusion Intra-articular injection of either autologous PRP or sodium hyaluronate can effectively alleviate the clinical symptoms of KOA when combined with isokinetic strength training. However, PRP is the more effective. Its use is worthy of clinical application and promotion. Key words: Knees; Osteoarthritis; Plasma; sodium hyaluronate; Isokinetic strength

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.121
Threshold uncertainty score0.834

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhonghua wuli yixue zazhiSame topicPeriodontal Regeneration and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207