MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Current perception threshold and pain tolerance threshold of median nerve of Parkinson's disease patients associated with pain

2015· article· en· W3032877295 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sijiao Li, Chengjie Mao, Yi Chen, Huijun Zhang, Jie Li, Weidong Hu, Ling Li, Shasha Guo

Bibliographic record

VenueChin J Neurol · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsThreshold of painPain toleranceVisual analogue scaleMedicineRating scaleParkinson's diseaseMontreal Cognitive AssessmentInternal medicinePhysical therapyPsychologyAnesthesiaDiseaseCognitive impairmentDevelopmental psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To explore the role of current perception threshold and pain tolerance threshold of median serve of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients associated with pain. Methods Sixty-four PD patients and 30 healthy controls were enrolled in the study. Using the Neurometer CPT, current perception threshold and pain tolerance threshold testing at 2 000, 250, 5 Hz was performed on median nerves of both hands. PD patients were assessed by the following rating scales: Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), Hoehn-Yahr Scale (H-Y), Hamilton Depressive Scale (HAMD), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Mini Mental State Examination. Results PD patients had increased current perception threshold at 2 000, 250, 5 Hz of right hand as compared with control group (315.3±58.7 vs 290.1±38.6, t=-2.137, P=0.035; 112.3±29.3 vs 100.7±12.6, t=-2.701, P=0.008; 80.7±29.2 vs 71.1±15.1, t=-2.102, P=0.038) and had reduced pain tolerance threshold at 2 000, 250, 5 Hz of both hands(left hand: 15.6±2.6 vs 16.7±2.3, t=1.933, P=0.056; 8.9±2.7 vs 10.0±1.7, t=2.445, P=0.017; 12.1±4.1 vs 13.6±1.9, t=2.395, P=0.019; right hand: 14.6±3.5 vs 16.1±2.4, t=2.383, P=0.020; 8.9±2.3 vs 9.7±1.0, t=2.365, P=0.020; 11.5±4.5 vs 13.6±4.0, t=2.191, P=0.032). PD patients with pain had lower pain tolerance threshold at 2 000, 250, 5 Hz of both hands, compared with PD patients without pain (left hand: 14.7±2.4 vs 16.6±2.6, t=3.041, P=0.003; 8.1±2.3 vs 9.9±2.7, t=2.766, P=0.007; 10.9±4.7 vs 13.4±3.0, t=2.439, P=0.018; right hand: 13.5±3.1 vs 15.8±3.6, t=2.647, P=0.010; 8.1±2.0 vs 9.8±2.4, t=3.052, P=0.003; 10.3±3.9 vs 13.0±4.7, t=2.546, P=0.013). Compared with the PD patients without pain, PD patients with pain had higher scores of UPDRS, H-Y, HAMD and lower scores of MoCA. Conclusions In PD patients, the current perception threshold and pain tolerance threshold are abnormal, especially in the PD patients with pain. The sensory nerve function impairment may be involved in the mechanisms of pain in PD. Key words: Parkinson disease; Pain; Median nerve; Pain threshold; Sensory thresholds; Predictive value of tests

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.736

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChin J NeurolSame topicParkinson's Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207