MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032926244 · doi:10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6909

TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA ATAS TERGANGGUNYA FREKUENSI RADIO PENERBANGAN DI WILAYAH UDARA PANTAI UTARA JAWA GUNA MENJAMIN KESELAMATAN PENERBANGAN

2019· article· en· W3032926244 on OpenAlexaff
Farras Naufal, H. K. Martono

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Hukum Adigama · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicInternational Law and Aviation
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTicketAir transportBusinessAviationAeronauticsComputer securityComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Indonesia is an archipelagic country that can be divided into land, water and airspace. For the sake of realizing a national insight, it requires a transportation system. Transportation can be divided into land, sea and air transportation. Air transportation is a very efficient transportation for humans because it has comfort and can save time. Air transportation growth in Indonesia are rising highly time by time, law must provide the rule of operation of air transport. Passenger have right to get to destination that ruled on air ticket. Beside of the destination, passenger must get delivered by the time that written on ticket. Airline must provide aircraft that could carry all passenger that have the ticket, but in practice, some passenger can’t be carried by airline because there was changes of the type of aircraft that carry less passenger than planned. Passenger must get compensation from the loss. Airline shall responsible from causing the trouble. There some responsibility system in Indonesia law, but for the case of the above, the responsibility system that should airline take is unclear. This journal will discuss about the responsibility system that can be used for the case and how law govern to clear the problem.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.255 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Hukum AdigamaSame topicInternational Law and AviationFrench-language works237,207