MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3032971953 · doi:10.14740/cii.v5i2.102

Miliary Tuberculosis Presenting as Pyrexia of Unknown Origin in a Health Care Worker

2020· article· en· W3032971953 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Abraham M. Ittyachen, Shamnad Pookunju, Juby Sara Koshy, Binu Mary Bose

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Infection and Immunity · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHematological disorders and diagnostics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTuberculosisMiliary tuberculosisFever of unknown originHealth careIntensive care medicinePathologySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pyrexia of unknown origin (PUO) also known as fever of unknown origin (FUO) is a condition that has tested the clinical acumen of many a physician. The myriad conditions that present as PUO and the absence of any leading clinical clues make it a challenge for any doctor. It is well known that health care workers (HCWs) are at high risk of contracting infectious diseases. The threat of infection with blood-borne pathogens is more serious among HCWs than in the general populace because of the risk of occupational exposure to blood and body fluids. Emerging infectious diseases particularly air-borne ones pose a significant health hazard to HCWs. The increased risk of tuberculosis (TB) among HCWs is also well documented. TB can manifest in atypical ways in an HCW. A case of miliary TB presenting as PUO in an HCW has not been reported in indexed literature. Herein we report such a case. Clin Infect Immun. 2020;5(2):41-44 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/cii102

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.092
GPT teacher head0.424
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Infection and ImmunitySame topicHematological disorders and diagnosticsFrench-language works237,207