Learning‐based design of random measurement matrix for compressed sensing with inter‐column correlation using copula function
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, a novel learning‐based approach for the design of a compressed sensing measurement matrix is proposed. In contrast with the state‐of‐the‐art methods, the suggested approach takes into account the correlation within entries of each column of the measurement matrix, namely, the inter‐column correlation (ICC). The new method makes use of a rather small number of training sparse signal vectors in a recursive scheme to obtain their corresponding measurement vectors. The latter is exploited to estimate the copula function of measurements which, in turn, is used to generate an arbitrary number of measurement vector ensembles. By using the latter, the autocorrelation of the measurement vectors is estimated precisely and then, the ICC of measurement matrix under design is obtained from the autocorrelation. Given the resulting ICC, the measurement matrix columns are to be generated independently, e.g. by employing a proper random Gaussian vector generator. Performance evaluations using both synthetic and real‐world data confirm the superiority of the proposed approach to the less recent methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it