MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033138744 · doi:10.2118/0620-0008-jpt

Comments: Recalibrating to a New Normal

2020· article· en· W3033138744 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Pam Boschee

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicGlobal Energy and Sustainability Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOil shaleQuarter (Canadian coin)Supply and demandAgency (philosophy)Petroleum industryFossil fuelEconomicsBusinessGeographyEngineeringMacroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Pre-COVID-19 forecasts were blown out of the water and nearly made moot quickly in the first quarter of this year. Attempts to form long-term forecasts are stymied by uncertainties until some degree of stabilization returns to the oil and gas industry. The recent meteoric oil price dive plus the pandemic narrowed the window for defining “long term” with confidence. For example, Fatih Birol’s comment, “We see early signs of a gradual rebalancing of oil markets. It is still gradual and it is still fragile,” might be interpreted as cautiously optimistic. The executive director of the International Energy Agency (IEA) also tweeted upon the release of the agency’s monthly report in mid-May … “the picture is still very bleak for the industry. After ‘Black April,’ the heaviest demand destruction may be behind us, but huge uncertain-ties remain. We now forecast global oil demand will fall by 8.6 mb/d in 2020.” Global supply remains excessive but is being dialed back. In what previously would have been an unexpected twist, the US will be the single largest contributor to the historic drop in crude supply, a decline of 12 million B/D by the end of the year. The shale operators, who not so long ago were producing at record levels, are now the primary drivers in decreasing global production largely by rapidly shutting in their wells, especially in the Permian and Bakken. Non-OPEC producers will account for nearly one-third (approximately 4 million B/D) of the global supply drawdown. The US is forecast to rein in the majority (about 3 million B/D) - surpassing Saudi Arabia’s expected supply cuts, including its recent further reduction of 1 million B/D (bringing its expected daily production to 7.5 million instead of 8.5 million). Canada, Norway, and Brazil are also pulling back production. Global supply may continue to outpace demand as lockdowns ease and consumption of oil and gas picks up in travel and individual and industrial activity, the duration and timing of which is unpredictable. Although Brent and West Texas Intermediate crude prices remain down more than 50% year to date, they have rebounded from the recent fast and furious drops. The level of the rebound, however, does not yet come close to recovery across the industry. Over the short or long term, the definitions of recovery will be recalibrated to a changed “normal.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.899
Threshold uncertainty score0.417

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicGlobal Energy and Sustainability ResearchFrench-language works237,207