A type of arrangement for photonic crystal structures interacting with a Terahertz wave with omnidirectional and thermal effects
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Omnidirectional photonic bandgaps are a new special type of one-dimensional quasi-photonic crystals that contains semiconductor and dielectric material layers and are investigated here in the Terahertz wave range. The proposed medium is constructed with a special type of layer arrangement, which uses both the Fibonacci sequence as a quasi-periodic sequence and the absolute periodic sequence in a period. As the Terahertz bandgaps of the transmittance spectrum are essential in some devices, the tuning and manipulation of these bandgaps has been of great interest in recent years. One of the best methods of manipulating these bandgaps to reach the desired outcome is by changing their arrangement using different types of quasi-periodic sequences in the structure. The beneficial results of applying these sequences have been clearly observed. So, we propose another new type of arrangement here in order to completely satisfy the changing methods of the photonic crystal structures. According to the results of the current investigation, it has been demonstrated that the proposed arrangement could be used to achieve a wide variety of desirable states. The semiconductor could make the bandgaps tunable via temperature changes through its thermally tunable permittivity. These types of media, which can operate as tunable Terahertz filters and mirrors, offer many promising omnidirectional Terahertz components and devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".