Synthesis and Evaluation of Chitosan‐Heparin‐Minocycline Composite Membranes for Potential Antibacterial Applications
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study, novel antibacterial composite membranes, namely Chitosan‐Heparin‐Minocycline composite membranes, are prepared from chitosan, heparin, minocycline, and CaCl 2 via ion pairing and complexation. These membranes are characterized using Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and energy‐dispersive X‐ray spectroscopy. Release kinetics of minocycline from these membranes is evaluated in vitro. Their antibacterial activities are assessed using agar disk diffusion and biofilm assays in vitro. The chemical and physical characterization confirms the successful synthesis of composite membranes. The two types of minocycline‐containing membranes achieve sustained release of minocycline for 17 days and 4 weeks in simulated body fluid, respectively. They demonstrate sustained potent antimicrobial effects against Staphylococcus aureus and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in agar disk diffusion assays. Biofilm assays reveal that both minocycline‐containing composite membranes significantly reduce viability of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in 7‐day biofilms. These results suggest that these minocycline‐containing composite membranes can be exploited for antibacterial applications in medicine and dentistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".