MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033504884

Using comparative oncology approach to develop radioimmunotherapy for osteosarcoma

2020· article· en· W3033504884 on OpenAlexaff
Jaline Broqueza, Samitha Andrahennadi, Kevin J. Allen, Ryan Dickinson, Valerie MacDonald‐Dickinson, Maruti Uppalapati, Ekaterina Dadachova

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Research and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadioimmunotherapyOsteosarcomaAntibodyMedicineCancer researchOncologyCancerMalignancyAntigenInternal medicineImmunologyMonoclonal antibody
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1222 Introduction: Osteosarcoma (OS) is the most common primary malignant bone tumor and the fifth most common primary malignancy among adolescents and young adults. In over 30 years, the five year overall survival has remained static at approximately 70% with no significant advancement in treatment options. In addition, OS demonstrates sweeping genetic variability from one tumor to the next which makes it challenging to pursue conventional targeting approaches. The cation independent mannose-6-phosphate/insulin-like growth factor-2 receptor (IGF2R) was recently found to be consistently overexpressed on multiple standard and patient-derived OS cell lines, making it a promising therapeutic target. Radioimmunotherapy (RIT) is a method wherein an antigen-specific antibody conjugated with an alpha- or beta-emitting radioisotope delivers cytotoxic radiation in a targeted fashion. This technique can be a novel treatment for OS. Interestingly, OS is one of the most widespread cancers in companion dogs and very closely resembles human OS. Treatment for dogs with OS is limited. Therefore, for this project, we aim to create a novel, effective and safe treatment for patients with metastatic OS based on radioimmunotherapy and utilizing comparative oncology approach. Methods: We used phage-display approach to develop human antibodies that are specific for human IGF2R and is cross-reactive with similar affinities to murine and canine versions of IGF2R. The generated antibodies were tested for tumor binding in SCID mice bearing human and canine tumor grafts. Results: Several Fab’ and full antibodies cross-reactive with IGF2R from human, dogs and mice were generated. When radiolabeled with 111In - these antibodies bound to human and canine grafted tumors in mice as confirmed by microSPECT/CT imaging. Conclusions: Future studies will involve radiolabeling best binding antibodies with 177Lu to target OS tumor cells in the experimental OS in mice first, and then in companion dogs with OS and to deliver curative tumoricidal doses of radioactivity to the tumors without toxicity to normal organs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.518
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.209
GPT teacher head0.421
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCancer Research and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207