Entrepreneurial Orientation as a Determinant of Oil and Gas Service Firm Performance in Nigeria: The Moderating Role of External Environment
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Oil and gas service sector is one of the major sectors of the oil and gas industry that contributes to and enhances economic functions across the globe. This industry in Nigeria was plagued with problems of unstable global oil prices, absence of entrepreneurial mindset, poor entrepreneurship ideas and mis-match of entrepreneurial orientation strategies with local and international business environmental conditions. Due to these problems, the oil and gas service firms recorded declining market performance and profitability. This study therefore examined the effect of entrepreneurial orientation components on overall performance. The study adopted cross-sectional survey research design with a target population of 14,038 owners and managers of oil and gas service companies operating in Nigeria. A mixed sampling technique was adopted to select the sample size of 576 using the Cochran (1997) formula. The data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and multiple and hierarchical regression methods of analyses. Findings revealed that entrepreneurial orientation components (proactiveness, innovativeness, risk taking propensity, autonomy and competitive aggressiveness) had significant effect on market performance (Adj.R2 = .538, F-stat = 92.142, p<0.05). Entrepreneurial orientation components significantly affected profitability (Adj. R2 = .626, F-stat = 76.584, p<0.05); while external environment significantly moderated the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance (Δ Adj.R2 = .593, ΔF = 25.451; F-stat = 47.215, p<0.05) all at 5% level of significance. Implications of the findings and recommendations were made.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".