Both Stationary and Dynamic Functional Interhemispheric Connectivity Are Strongly Associated With Performance on Cognitive Tests in Multiple Sclerosis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although functional connectivity has been extensively studied in MS, robust estimates of both stationary (static connectivity at the time) and dynamic (connectivity variation across time) functional connectivity has not been commonly evaluated and neither has its association to cognition. In this study, we focused on interhemispheric connections as previous research has shown links between anatomical homologous connections and cognition. We examined functional interhemispheric connectivity (IC) in MS during resting-state functional MRI using both stationary and dynamic strategies and related connectivity measures to processing speed performance. Twenty-five patients with relapsing-remitting MS and 41 controls were recruited. Stationary functional IC was assessed between homologous Regions of Interest (ROIs) using correlation. For dynamic IC, a sliding window approach was used to quantify changes between homologous ROIs across time. We related IC measures to cognitive performance with correlation and regression. Compared to control subjects, MS demonstrated increased IC across homologous regions, which accurately predicted performance on the symbol digit modalities test (SDMT) (R2 = 0.96) and paced auditory serial addition test (PASAT) (R2 = 0.59). Dynamic measures were not different between the 2 groups, but dynamic IC was related to PASAT scores. The associations between stationary/dynamic connectivity and cognitive tests demonstrated that different aspects of functional IC were associated with cognitive processes. Processing speed measured in SDMT was associated with static interhemispheric connections and better PASAT performance, which requires working memory, sustain attention, and processing speed, was more related to rigid IC, underlining the neurophysiological mechanism of cognition in MS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".