MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033541649 · doi:10.1615/tfec2020.tfl.031916

STUDY OF THE INTERACTIONS BETWEEN TAILPIPE EXHAUST FLOW AND AHMED BODY WAKE

2020· article· en· W3033541649 on OpenAlexaff
C. H. Blanchard, Ram Balachandar, Frédéric Murzyn

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Noise and Vibration Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWakeFlow (mathematics)MechanicsEnvironmental sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Air quality is a key issue. Cars contribute significantly to the emission of gaseous pollutants. It is crucial to analyse how these pollutants disperse in the wake of a vehicle and infiltrate the car cabin exposing passengers to high concentrations. Here, a 3D numerical study of the flow developing downstream of a simplified car model (squared-back Ahmed body) is presented when a gas (Nitrogen) is emitted from the exhaust pipe. A Reynolds-Average-Navier-Stokes (RANS) model (k- SST) is used coupled with a multicomponent gas method. Parameters for the simulation correspond to experimental investigations led in a wind tunnel to allow comparisons and the validation of the results. Based on the height of the car and the incoming velocity, the Reynolds number is 510 4 . Altogether, these conditions correspond to an urban environment. This study focuses on the mixing between air and nitrogen and the flow dynamics in the close wake. We show that the tailpipe flow has no significant influence on the wake flow meaning that it is fully offset by the momentum of the incoming flow. Comparisons with experimental data obtained in wind tunnel at the same reduced scale are provided. Strong agreements are found for mean and turbulent velocities and for Reynolds stresses validating our model. The results of the volume fraction of nitrogen are also discussed indicating that the gas tracer is captured by the recirculation region due to turbulent structures. These results could provide interesting indications regarding the positioning of air intake in order to minimize pollutant infiltration.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.489
Threshold uncertainty score0.160

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVehicle Noise and Vibration ControlFrench-language works237,207