MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Simple adaptor to decrease aerosolisation during endotracheal intubation

2020· article· en· W3033700823 on OpenAlexaff
Glenio B. Mizubuti, Leopoldo Muniz da Silva, Rodrigo Moreira e Lima, Anthony M.‐H. Ho

Bibliographic record

VenuePostgraduate Medical Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInfection Control and Ventilation
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsStyletMedicineSyringeIntubationMidazolamCuffEndotracheal intubationSurgeryAnesthesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During this COVID-19 pandemic, at increased risk of infection are clinicians involved in aerosol-generating procedures such as endotracheal intubation.1 We herein describe a technique to mitigate aerosolisation. As shown in the figure 1A, the rubber bung of a 20 mL syringe plunger is used to occlude the connector of the endotracheal tube (ETT) figure 1B, preventing aerosolised particles (eg, during coughing) from being directed towards the operator. Once the ETT tip has passed the larynx and its cuff has been inflated to ensure seal, a clamp is applied to the ETT (not shown) prior to removal of the adaptor and connecting to the Ambu bag/ventilator. When a stylet/bougie is required during direct/videolaryngoscopy, a small hole is created using a small hypodermic needle at the centre of the syringe rubber piece to accommodate the stylet/bougie while still maintaining a seal (figure 1C,E). One can also improvise with a myriad of laparoscopic adaptors that already have a small centre hole.2 In this case, on successful intubation, the ETT cuff is immediately inflated and the stylet/bougie is partially removed (while keeping the adaptor in place) to allow for the application of an ETT clamp distal to the stylet/bougie tip (figure 1D) prior to complete removal of the stylet/bougie–adaptor assembly and connecting to the Ambu bag/ventilator. A similar technique should be used during extubation. Coughing should be minimised using a combination of lignocaine, opioids, muscle relaxant and reversal agent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.606
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePostgraduate Medical JournalSame topicInfection Control and VentilationFrench-language works237,207