Heat Shock Protein 27 versus Estrogen Therapy for Post-Menopausal Atherosclerosis: Rethinking Mechanisms of Cholesterol Lowering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Aims The estrogen-inducible protein Heat Shock Protein 27 (HSP27) as well as anti-HSP27 antibodies are elevated in healthy subjects compared to cardiovascular disease patients. Vaccination of ApoE -/- mice with recombinant HSP25 (rHSP25, the murine ortholog), boosts anti-HSP25 levels and attenuates atherogenesis. As estrogens promote HSP27 synthesis, cellular release and blood levels, we hypothesize that menopause will result in loss of HSP27 atheroprotection. Hence, we now compare the efficacy of rHSP25 vaccination vs . estradiol (E2) therapy for the prevention of post-menopausal atherogenesis. Methods and Results ApoE -/- mice subjected to ovariectomy (OVX) showed a 65% increase atherosclerotic burden compared to sham mice after 5 weeks of a high fat diet. Relative to vaccination with rC1, a truncated HSP27 control peptide, atherogenesis was reduced by 5-weekly rHSP25 vaccinations (−43%), a subcutaneous E2 slow release pellet (−52%) or a combination thereof (−82%). Plasma cholesterol levels declined in parallel with the reductions in atherogenesis, but relative to rC1/OVX mice plasma PCSK9 levels were 52% higher in E2/OVX and 41% lower in rHSP25/OVX mice (p<0.0001 for both). Hepatic LDLR mRNA levels did not change with E2 treatment but increased markedly with rHSP25 vaccination. Conversely, hepatic PCSK9 mRNA increased 148% with E2 treatment vs . rC1/OVX but did not change with rHSP25 vaccination. In human HepG2 hepatocytes E2 increased PCSK9 promoter activity 303%, while the combination of [rHSP27 + PAb] decreased PCSK9 promoter activity by 64%. Conclusion The reduction in post-OVX atherogenesis and cholesterol levels with rHSP25 vaccination is associated with increased LDLR but not PCSK9 expression. Surprisingly, E2 therapy attenuates atherogenesis and cholesterol levels post-OVX without altering LDLR but increases PCSK9 expression and promoter activity. This is the first documentation of increased PCSK9 expression with E2 therapy and raises questions about balancing physiological estrogenic / PCSK9 homeostasis and targeting PCSK9 in women – are there effects beyond cholesterol?
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".