MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033762783 · doi:10.19044/esj.2020.v16n15p223

Impact De La Divagation Des Bovins Sur Les Cultures Dans La Ville De Korhogo

2020· article· fr· W3033762783 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gatien Konan Gboko Brou, Guy Kouassi Brou, Seguena Fofana, René Yadé Soro

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJ · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForestryHumanitiesGeographyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Une étude a été menée dans la ville de Korhogo en vue de déterminer l’impact de la divagation des bovins sur les cultures. Pour ce faire, une enquête a été menée auprès de 90 cultivateurs et 50 éleveurs. Les résultats ont montré que les éleveurs et les cultivateurs étaient en majorité des hommes contre une minorité de femmes. Les principales races de bovins élevées ont été par ordre d’importance les métis, les zébus, les baoulés et les N’damas. Le mode d’élevage prédominant a été la divagation où les bovins ont été principalement nourris avec le fourrage naturel et abreuvés dans les cours d’eau. La divagation des bovins dans les champs a entrainé beaucoup de dégâts au niveau des différentes cultures. Les cultures annuelles ont été les plus endommagées suivies des cultures maraîchères. Les cultures pérennes ont été moins attaquées. Les causes des dégâts ont été identifiées aussi bien chez les éleveurs que chez les cultivateurs. Les conséquences ont été observées aussi bien chez les bovins que les cultures. En définitive, une sensibilisation serait nécessaire dans le monde agricole en vue de limiter les dégâts de la divagation des bovins. A study was carried out in the city of Korhogo to determine the impact of cattle rambling on crops. To do this, a survey was conducted among 90 growers and 50 breeders. The results showed that the majority of breeders and cultivators were men against a minority of women. The main breeds of cattle raised were, in order of importance, the mestizos, the zebus, the baoulés and the N’damas. The predominant breeding method was straying where cattle were mainly fed with natural fodder and watered in the rivers. The rambling of cattle in the fields has caused a lot of damage in different crops. Annual crops were the most damaged, followed by vegetable crops. Perennial crops have been less attacked. The causes of the damage have been identified for both breeders and cultivators. The consequences have been observed in both cattle and crops. Ultimately, awareness would be necessary in the agricultural world in order to limit the damage caused by the ramblings of cattle.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Scientific Journal ESJSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207