Water-Based Dual-Cross-Linked Polymer Binders for High-Energy-Density Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Bibliographic record
Abstract
High-mass-loading electrodes with long-term stability have long been a great challenge for lithium–sulfur batteries (LSBs), since the conventional binders are unable to cope with the shuttling of lithium polysulfides and the structural damage in an electrode. Here, a novel water-based polymer, polyphosphate acid cross-linked chitosan ethylamide carbamide (PACEC), is developed as a binder to construct high-energy-density sulfur cathode and flexible LSBs. With a dual-cross-linked network, the PACEC shows excellent affinity with lithium polysulfides to relieve the shuttle effect and robust mechanical properties to stabilize the electrode. The sulfur cathode based on PACEC demonstrates a high sulfur loading of 14.8 mg cm–2, the areal initial capacity of 17.5 mAh cm–2, and Coulombic efficiency of 99.3%, while the amount of electrolyte is strictly limited to 6 μL mg–1. More importantly, a robust pouch cell with an area of 6 cm2 and only 177% oversized lithium can successfully integrate the energy density of 6.5 mAh cm–2 with the cycling retention per cycle of 99.74% during 270 cycles and flexibility at a curvature of 3 mm. This study provides inspirations for the design of eco-friendly polymer binders and paving new ways for the development of LSBs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".