MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033970295 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v9i1-2.630

Primary Fallopian Tube Carcinoma Preoperatively Diagnosed as Cervical Cancer

2020· article· en· W3033970295 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Misa Kobayashi, Hiroshi Adachi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCervixCervical cancerStage (stratigraphy)Fallopian tube cancerRadiologySurgeryOvarian cancerGynecologyCancerInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Primary fallopian tube carcinoma (PFTC) is an uncommon gynecologic malignancy that is often diagnosed in the advanced stage. We present herein a case of a 59-year-old female with PFTC diagnosed with an approximately 20-mm cervical tumor on visual inspection. Cervical biopsy showed carcinoma and systemic computed tomography demonstrated no evidence of metastasis. The patient was accordingly diagnosed with cervical adenocarcinoma stage IB1 (FIGO 2008). Abdominal radical hysterectomy including bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy was performed. However, it was difficult to operate because of dense pelvic organ adhesions and pouch of Douglas obliteration accompanied with deep infiltrating endometriosis. There was no peritoneal dissemination. On histopathological examination, high-grade serous carcinomas arising from the left fallopian tube and metastasized to the endometrium, cervix, vagina and multiple pelvic lymph nodes and forming a tumor in the cervix were noted. The patient was diagnosed with PFTC stage IIIA1 (ii) (FIGO 2014), pT2aN1bM0 (eighth UICC). She received six cycles of docetaxel and carboplatin every 3 weeks and presented no evidence of disease for 6 months after the chemotherapy. In conclusion, this is a rare case in which PFTC was preoperatively diagnosed as cervical cancer. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2020;9(1-2):21-24 doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jcgo630

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.369
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicOvarian cancer diagnosis and treatmentFrench-language works237,207