MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033980265 · doi:10.7759/cureus.8443

Cystoid Macular Edema in a 10-Year-Old Boy With Cohen Syndrome

2020· article· en· W3033980265 on OpenAlexaff
Caleb A. Liles, Michael S Tensmeyer, Justin M York, Lakmal Ekanayake, Julie C. Lew

Bibliographic record

VenueCureus · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBlood disorders and treatments
Canadian institutionsHeritage College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePediatricsMacular edemaCataractsHypoplasiaGenetic testingOphthalmologySurgeryInternal medicineRetinal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cohen syndrome is an extremely rare disease with characteristic somatic and multi-system features that severely affect vision. Ophthalmologists must consider Cohen syndrome when developmental delay, high-grade myopia, and retinal dystrophy are present in a child. Here we report a case of Cohen syndrome in a 10-year-old boy presenting with cystoid macular edema (CME), only the second reported case of its kind. This case illustrates the phenotypic variability that can occur in Cohen syndrome, with rare features in addition to CME including trace posterior subcapsular cataracts, growth hormone deficiency, mild vermian hypoplasia, a nasolacrimal cyst, hearing loss, and high-functioning intelligence quotient (IQ). Our patient did not have an identifiable second mutation even after extensive genetic testing, which raises questions about whether the patient has a novel gene variant for the disease or an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance exists for Cohen syndrome. In addition to peripheral vision loss, the rare appearance of macular edema can threaten the remaining vision and requires intervention. This case also demonstrates that, without a high index of suspicion, there can be considerable delay in diagnosing Cohen syndrome. Though little is known about the prevalence of many of the clinical features seen in our case in the Cohen syndrome population, this case raises awareness of the syndrome and the need to recognize various clinical features, perform genetic testing, and direct appropriate treatment to prevent complications and help improve quality of life.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCureusSame topicBlood disorders and treatmentsFrench-language works237,207