MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3033999436 · doi:10.1109/crv50864.2020.00029

Gas Prices of America: The Machine-Augmented Crowd-Sourcing Era

2020· article· en· W3033999436 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin Dick, François Charih, Jimmy Woo, James R. Green

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrowd sourcingComputer scienceData science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Google Street View (GSV) comprises the largest collection of vehicle-based imagery of the natural environment. With high spatial resolution, GSV has been widely adopted to study the natural environment despite its relatively low temporal resolution (i.e. limited time-series imagery available at a given location). However, vehicular-based imagery is poised to grow dramatically with the prophesied circulation of fleets of highly instrumented autonomous vehicles (AVs), producing high spatio-temporal resolution imagery of urban environments. As with GSV, leveraging these data presents the opportunity to extract information about the lived environment, while their high temporal resolution enables the study and annotation of time-varying phenomena. For example, circulating AVs will often capture location-coded images of gas stations. With a suitable CV system, one could extract the advertised numerical gas prices and automatically update crowd-sourced applications, such as GasBuddy. To this end, we assemble and release the Gas Prices of America (GPA) dataset, a large-scale, benchmark dataset of advertised gas prices from GSV imagery across the 49 mainland United States of America. Comprising 2,048 high quality annotated images, the GPA dataset enables the development and evaluation of CV models for gas price extraction from complex urban scenes. More generally, this dataset provides a challenging benchmark against which CV models can be evaluated for multi-number, multi-digit recognition tasks in the wild. For the digit-level classification task, the YOLO digit detection model trained on the Street View House Numbers dataset performed comparably to a random classifier, highlighting the difficulty of this task. Conversely, for the full-sign segmentation task, transfer learning of a DeepLabV3 ResNet101 model achieved a test F1 performance of 0.7125, following 100 epochs. Highly accurate models, when integrated with AV platforms, will represent the first opportunity to automatically update the traditionally human crowd-sourced GasBuddy dataset, heralding an era of machine-augmented crowd-sourcing. The dataset is available online at cu-bic.ca/gpa and at doi.org/10.5683/SP2/KQ6VNG. Accompanying code can be found at github.com/GreenCUBIC/Gas-Prices-of-America.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.726
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy, Environment, and Transportation PoliciesFrench-language works237,207