DNA binding reorganizes the intrinsically disordered C-terminal region of PSC in <i>Drosophila</i> PRC1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Polycomb Group (PcG) proteins regulate gene expression by modifying chromatin. A key PcG complex, Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1), has two activities: a ubiquitin ligase activity for histone H2A, and a chromatin compacting activity. In Drosophila , the Posterior Sex Combs (PSC) subunit of PRC1 is central to both activities. The N-terminal homology region (HR) of PSC assembles into PRC1, including partnering with dRING to form the ubiquitin ligase for H2A. The intrinsically disordered C-terminal region of PSC (PSC-CTR) compacts chromatin, and inhibits chromatin remodeling and transcription in vitro . Both the PSC-HR and the PSC-CTR are essential in vivo . To understand how these two activities may be coordinated in PRC1, we used cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) to analyze the conformations of the PSC-CTR in PRC1 and how they change on binding DNA. XL-MS identifies interactions between the PSC-CTR and the core of PRC1, including between the PSC-CTR and PSC-HR. New contacts and overall more compacted PSC-CTR conformations are induced by DNA binding. Protein footprinting of accessible lysine residues in the PSC-CTR reveals an extended, bipartite candidate DNA/chromatin binding surface. Our data suggest a model in which DNA (or chromatin) follows a long path on the flexible PSC-CTR. Intramolecular interactions of the PSC-CTR detected by XL-MS can bring the high affinity DNA/chromatin binding region close to the core of PRC1 without disrupting the interface between the ubiquitin ligase and the nucleosome. Our approach may be applicable to understanding the global organization of other large IDRs that bind nucleic acids. Highlights An intrinsically disordered region (IDR) in Polycomb protein PSC compacts chromatin Cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) was used to analyze topology of the PSC IDR Protein footprinting suggests a bipartite DNA binding surface in the PSC IDR A model for the DNA-driven organization of the PSC IDR Combining XL-MS and protein footprinting is a strategy to understand nucleic acid binding IDRs Abstract Figure
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".