MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034219781 · doi:10.1016/j.ocarto.2020.100083

Metabolic and physiological effects of high intensity interval training in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A pilot and feasibility study

2020· article· en· W3034219781 on OpenAlex
Abbie E. Smith‐Ryan, Malia N.M. Blue, Kara C. Anderson, Katie R. Hirsch, Kelli D. Allen, Janet L. Huebner, Michael J. Muehlbauer, Olga Ilkayeva, Virginia B. Kraus, William E. Kraus, Yvonne M. Golightly, Kim M. Huffman

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueOsteoarthritis and Cartilage Open · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiovascular and exercise physiology
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsOsteoarthritisHigh-intensity interval trainingMedicineInterval trainingPhysical therapyIntensity (physics)Physical medicine and rehabilitationPathologyAlternative medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To examine the feasibility of a 6-week high intensity interval training (HIIT) program in patients with symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (OA). A secondary aim was to evaluate the change in whole-body metabolism. In a single-arm intervention, 16 adults (mean age 59.9 yrs; BMI: 29.0 ± 4.3 kg/m2; 77% female) with radiographically diagnosed knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence [KLG]: 2–4) and moderate to severe pain score (≥6) from the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Index (WOMAC) enrolled in a 6-week, twice weekly, supervised HIIT cycle ergometry intervention. The primary outcome was feasibility; secondary outcomes included change in peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak), WOMAC, and circulating biomarkers of metabolism. Feasibility was moderate; of the 21 participants screened by phone, 16 were enrolled; 13 completed pre- and post-testing. The average adherence rate (sessions completed/available) was >96%. VO2peak was significantly improved (mean ± SD: 2.6 ± 3.0 mL/min/kg; 95% CI [0.70–4.56]). Significant improvements in WOMAC (mean ± SD: −8.7 ± 12.5; CI: [18.9 to −2.80]), pain [-5.15 to −1.01], and function [-12.9 to −0.98] resulted. There was a significant reduction in concentrations of amino acids: methionine, phenylalanine, and tyrosine (p < 0.02 for all), with trends towards lower concentrations of serine (p = 0.08; [-20.66-1.18]) and greater aspartate/asparagine (p = 0.06; [-1.99-65.73].). Post-training acylcarnitine concentrations were reduced with training. In this cohort of overweight adults with symptomatic knee OA, 6-weeks of HIIT cycling showed excellent rates of retention and adherence with no adverse events, improved cardiorespiratory fitness and OA symptoms, in concert with metabolic alterations indicative of improved skeletal muscle energetics. clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03039452.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.496
Threshold uncertainty score0.684

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it