MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034329876 · doi:10.2337/db20-1163-p

1163-P: Cost Effectiveness of Oral Semaglutide 14mg vs. Empagliflozin 25mg in Canada

2020· article· en· W3034329876 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aiden R. Liu, Peter G. Bech, Adam Fridhammar, Andreas Nilsson, Michael Willis, Solomon Nuhoho

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEmpagliflozinSemaglutideMedicineMetforminType 2 Diabetes MellitusType 2 diabetesDapagliflozinGlycemicInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusInsulinEndocrinologyLiraglutide

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: A1C lowering was significantly greater for oral semaglutide 14 mg than empagliflozin 25 mg for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) uncontrolled on metformin in the 52-week, randomized, open-label PIONEER 2 trial (NCT02863328). We estimated the cost effectiveness of oral semaglutide vs. empagliflozin in Canada from the payer and societal perspectives. Methods: Modeling methods were used to extrapolate benefits observed in PIONEER 2 to long-term costs and outcomes, including quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), for patients treated with oral semaglutide or empagliflozin. As with analysis in other settings, the IHE-Diabetes Cohort Model (IHE-DCM) was used. The analysis was also run using the Economic and Health Outcomes microsimulation model (ECHO-T2DM). Patient baseline characteristics and treatment effects were sourced from PIONEER 2. In the model simulations, both agents were assumed discontinued and insulin initiated when A1C was >8.0%. Unit costs (CAD$) and utilities were sourced from the literature. Results: Oral semaglutide was associated with more QALYs than empagliflozin over 40 years (0.39 with IHE-DCM and 0.34 with ECHO-T2DM). The gains came with increased costs (CAD$8,202 with IHE-DCM and CAD$9,255 with ECHO-T2DM), yielding incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of CAD$21,115 and CAD$27,496/QALY gained, respectively, below the often-cited willingness-to-pay threshold of CAD$50,000/QALY. When productivity costs and the full societal perspective are considered, the ICERs were CAD$18,239 and CAD$19,112, respectively. Sensitivity analyses that included cost, treatment effect, time horizon and biomarker rebound assumptions generally confirmed the results. Conclusion: Two models independently found oral semaglutide to be cost-effective compared to empagliflozin over 40 years for the treatment of patients with T2DM uncontrolled on metformin in Canada. While uncommon, the use of two models can reduce decision-making uncertainty. Disclosure A.R. Liu: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk Canada Inc. P.G. Bech: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. A. Fridhammar: None. A. Nilsson: None. M. Willis: Board Member; Self; The Swedish Institute for Health Economics. Consultant; Self; Janssen Global Services, LLC., Mundipharma International, Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Self; The Swedish Institute for Health Economics. S. Nuhoho: Employee; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Johnson & Johnson. Funding Novo Nordisk Canada Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207