MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034390795 · doi:10.2337/db20-141-or

141-OR: Efficacy and Safety of Naltrexone/Bupropion as Add-On to Incretin Agents in Patients with Obesity and T2DM

2020· article· en· W3034390795 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sean Wharton, Peter Yin, Fernando Camacho, Melonie Burrows, Jessica Blavignac, Maxime Barakat

Bibliographic record

VenueDiabetes · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDiabetes Treatment and Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIncretinTolerabilityMetforminPlaceboInternal medicineType 2 diabetesWeight lossSitagliptinBupropionPopulationEndocrinologyDiabetes mellitusPharmacologyObesityAdverse effectInsulin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is significant overlap between obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Incretin agents (dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs)) are recommended as second-line to metformin in patients with T2DM due to their glucose-lowering effects, low risk of hypoglycemia, and favorable effect on weight. Naltrexone/bupropion (NB) is a combination therapy approved in North America and Europe for chronic weight management. This is an exploratory analysis of the efficacy and safety of NB in T2DM subjects enrolled in two double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III studies (N=1344), that were stable on an incretin agent prior to randomization. At 1 year, mean weight change was -4.6% ± 0.21% in NB (N=700) compared to -1.1% ± 0.15% in placebo (N=644). In subjects randomized to NB that achieved at ≥5% weight loss at week 16 (early responders, N=269), mean weight change at 1 year was -8.8% ± 0.34%. An analysis of covariance using LOCF adjusting for age, sex, baseline BMI, baseline weight, and responder status revealed no significant interaction between incretin agent and weight treatment medication (p=0.1317), a significant treatment NB vs. placebo effect (p<0.0001), but not a significant incretin agent effect (p=0.1388). Safety and tolerability profiles were in line as previously observed in the broader population. In conclusion, NB is efficacious and safe in reducing weight in patients with obesity and T2DM on DPP-4 inhibitors and GLP-1RAs, and may be an effective addition when weight loss is a focus in treatment. Disclosure S. Wharton: Advisory Panel; Self; Bausch Health Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc. P. Yin: Employee; Self; Bausch Health. F. Camacho: Consultant; Self; Bausch + Lomb, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc. M. Burrows: Employee; Self; Bausch Health. J. Blavignac: Employee; Self; Bausch Health Canada. M. Barakat: Employee; Self; Bausch Health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDiabetesSame topicDiabetes Treatment and ManagementFrench-language works237,207