The urge to move: From restless legs syndrome to impulse control disorders in Parkinson’s disease
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson's disease (PD) are defined as a failure to resist an "urge" to behave in a way that may be debilitating for oneself or others. The suggested immobilization test (SIT) has been developed to assess the "urge" to move and support the diagnosis of restless legs syndrome (RLS) in the general population and in PD. A clinical association between RLS and ICDs has been shown in PD and in the general population. We hypothesized that there could be a semiological overlap between RLS and ICDs, and conducted SIT in PD patients with and without ICDs. Fifty PD patients with (n = 17) and without (n = 33) current ICDs were included. SIT, videopolysomnography, demographical treatment, and motor, psycho-behavioural and sleep characteristics, including RLS, were recorded. PD patients with ICDs reported increased subjective discomfort during SIT (SD-SIT) compared to those without ICDs (p = .024). Multivariable analysis confirmed ICDs as an independent factor associated with increased SD-SIT in PD, regardless of the presence of RLS, PD severity and dopamine agonist treatment dose. The discomfort measured by SIT might not only reflect the "urge" to move in RLS but also the ICDs in PD, suggesting that ICDs and RLS in PD could share a common phenomenology.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".