video compression based on sphere‐rotated frame prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
360 video is very popular due to its 360 views of a scene. Although 360 videos are also compressed by a hybrid coding framework like 2D video, its high resolution and serious shape deformation affect coding efficiency. In equirectangular projection (ERP) format of 360 videos, if an object moves from equator regions to pole regions or vice versa, large deformation will be introduced and motion estimation cannot find the best‐matched part. To solve the above problem, the authors propose to generate a better reference frame for the current to be encoded frame. First, they project the frame prior to the current one from ERP to the sphere and rotate it at an appropriate angle depending on motion vectors. Subsequently, they insert this generated frame to the rear of the reference queue and let the encoder work as usual. The advantage is that the inserted frame has a more similar shape deformation as the current frame, which greatly helps motion estimation and makes full use of 360 video characters. Their method is simple and friendly compatible with the existing compression standard. Experiments prove that their method achieves 1.57% Bjøntegaard Delta (BD)‐gain compared with standard high efficiency video coding.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".