MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of paracetamol in the proliferation of glioblastoma cell line: the role of apoptosis, cox-2 and cyclin b expressions

2020· article· en· W3034504837 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ersoy Öksüz, Gökhan Görgişen, Hülya Özdemir, İsmail Musab Gülaçar, Gökhan Oto

Bibliographic record

VenueTurkish Neurosurgery · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsMedicineApoptosisCancer researchGlioblastomaCyclin D1Cell growthOncologyInternal medicineCell cycleCancerGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AIM: To investigate the relationship between paracetamol and expression levels of cyclooxygenase-2, cyclin B, cell viability and apoptosis in glioblastoma cell line. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The A172 glioblastoma cells were treated with different concentrations of paracetamol and phosphate buffer saline as a vehicle for 24, 48, and 72 hours. Cell viability was detected by MTT. Bax, procaspase 3, COX-2 and Cyclin B expressions were detected using Western blotting. RESULTS: A paracetamol treatment of 0.5 mg/mL for 24, 48, and 72 hours led to a 14%, 31%, and 37% decrease in cell viability. The expression of COX-2 and cyclin B levels decreased by 36% and 52% respectively, after treatment with 0.5 mg/mL paracetamol. Treatment with 0.5 mg/mL and 1 mg/mL paracetamol significantly induced the expression of cleaved caspase 3, procaspase 3 and Bax proteins compared to the control group (60%, 40%, 21%, %100, 18%, 17%, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of our study showed that paracetamol has antitumoral effects on glioblastoma cells and this activity was induced by different signaling pathways.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTurkish NeurosurgerySame topicInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsFrench-language works237,207