MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034632174 · doi:10.33137/utjph.v1i1.33810

Don't Take it With a Grain of Salt

2020· article· en· W3034632174 on OpenAlexaffabout
Yulika Yoshida‐Montezuma, Salma Hack, Christine Warren, Masha Jessri, JoAnne Arcand, Lindsay McLaren, Mary R. L’Abbé, Laura N. Anderson, Erin Hobin, Lennon Li, Douglas G. Manuel, Brendan T. Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicSodium Intake and Health
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityImpactUniversity of CalgaryOntario Tech UniversityOttawa HospitalPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSodiumMedicinePopulationEnvironmental healthSocioeconomic statusDietary SodiumDemographyBlood pressureInternal medicineChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Currently, sodium consumption of Canadians (2760 mg/day) exceeds the 2300 mg/day tolerable upper level putting Canadians at risk for hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Voluntary sodium reformulation strategies have been implemented in Canada, the United Kingdom (UK), United States (US) to reduce sodium intake from processed foods. The potential for sodium reformulation to reduce sodium intake across socioeconomic position (SEP) is not well understood. The objective of this study was to evaluate the extent to which fully achieving sodium reformulation targets for processed foods outlined in the Canada, UK, US strategies would decrease population and social inequities in sodium intake in Canadian adults. 
 Design: A cross-sectional study was conducted using the 2015 Canadian Community Health Survey–Nutrition (n=13,519 participants aged ≥19 years, 53% females). Foods from the 24-hour dietary recall were matched to each country’s sodium reduction categories and target sodium levels were applied. Multivariable linear regressions were used to estimate mean sodium intake for the population and across SEP indicators (educational attainment, household food security, and household income adequacy quintiles). 
 Results: Achieving Canada’s targets would reduce average sodium intake by 228 mg/day (95%CI: 196,260) compared to baseline. UK’s sodium targets would achieve greater reductions, decreasing average sodium intake by 270 mg/day (95%CI: 242,299). The US sodium targets would increase average sodium intake by 98 mg/day (95%CI: 64,132). Achieving sodium reformulation targets resulted in greater reductions in sodium intake in men, and in lower SEP groups. For example, educational inequalities in sodium intake observed at baseline were reduced in men [Canada: (RD: 148 mg/day, 95%CI: -30,327); UK: (RD: 152 mg/day, 95%CI: -43,347)] and eliminated in women. 
 Conclusion: Achieving targets outlined in Canada and UK’s voluntary sodium reformulation strategies would significantly reduce mean sodium intake in Canadians. This study demonstrated the potential for reducing social inequities in sodium intake and health.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.430
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public HealthSame topicSodium Intake and HealthFrench-language works237,207