MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3034645769 · doi:10.33137/utjph.v1i1.33832

Epidemic Keratoconjunctivitis Outbreak Investigation

2020· article· en· W3034645769 on OpenAlexaff
Anindita Marwah, Naureen Siddiqui, Matthew Muller

Bibliographic record

VenueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public Health · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOcular and Laser Science Research
Canadian institutionsSt. Michael's HospitalPublic Health OntarioUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOutbreakMedicineKeratoconjunctivitisPediatricsIncubation periodIndex caseEpidemiologyOdds ratioInternal medicineDermatologyVirology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: In June 2019, an epidemic keratoconjunctivitis (EKC) outbreak occurred in the ophthalmology clinic at St. Michael’s Hospital. This infection is caused by human adenovirus which has an incubation period of 2-14 days, and symptoms include redness and itchiness in the eyes, swelling of the eyes, and/or discharge from the eyes. An immediate cause or an index case was not determined, hence, a formal outbreak investigation was conducted in the form of a case-control study.
 Methods: The case-control study focused on 9 outbreak cases all from the same ophthalmologist’s clinic; 18 controls were randomly picked from the same clinic, and were matched to the cases on the date of visit to the clinic. Data was collected on all 27 participants on their gender, age, date and time of visit, details of staff that saw them during their visit, and the procedures done during their visit. Data analysis was then conducted to identify exposures that could have been associated with the cause of the outbreak.
 Results: It was found that all cases visited the eye clinic on two specific dates – four cases on May 29 and five on June 5 – and that having a non-contact laser procedure done on May 29 was associated with higher odds of being a case [OR=42; 95% CI = 1.016-1622; p-value<0.05]. Two cases seen on May 29 also returned on June 5, and they could have possibly propagated the transmission on the second day.
 Conclusion: A clear cause of the outbreak was not determined; however, the case-control study helped narrow down the cause of the outbreak and route of transmission. This outbreak also helped highlight the importance of proper hand hygiene and cleanliness of the patient environment to prevent similar outbreaks in the future.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.539
Threshold uncertainty score0.633

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.101
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUniversity of Toronto Journal of Public HealthSame topicOcular and Laser Science ResearchFrench-language works237,207