How the workplace spirituality influences work engagement through organizational commitment: Evidence from banking industry
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper aimed to investigate the relationship between employee spirituality, organizational commitment, and work engagement in Banking-sector. 243 respondents were collected in this research which represents 81 percent response rate. Validity used Confirmatory Factor Analysis used KMO and Bartlett's tests, and the reliability test conducted in this study was Cronbach-Alpha (Minimum Score is 0.7). Moreover, assumption of classic test result for normality test used were Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Heteroscedasticity used Park test. Findings. The research findings indicate that Workplace spirituality influenced on Organizational Commitment and Organizational Commitment influenced on Work Engagement. Also, the total score of Organizational Commitment mediated between Workplace Spirituality and Work Engagement. The findings in this research show the relationship model between work engagement, commitment, and work spirituality occurred both directly and indirectly where such relationship between workplace spirituality and work engagement was never measured in previous studies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".